Vaginal hysterectomy vs vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)
- no estimate extracted3 studies · 413 participantsLow
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in bladder function ‐ Stress incontinence compared with vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in painful intercourse ‐ Dyspareunia compared with vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).
Vaginal surgery with mesh showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse compared with without mesh (moderate certainty).
Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
Vaginal surgery with mesh showed no clear difference in surgery for recurrent prolapse compared with without mesh (moderate certainty).
Vaginal surgery with mesh showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with without mesh (low certainty).
Vaginal surgery with mesh showed no clear difference in bladder injury compared with without mesh (low certainty).
Vaginal surgery with mesh may leads to higher mesh exposure compared with without mesh (low certainty).
Vaginal surgery with mesh showed no clear difference in bladder function ‐ Stress incontinence compared with without mesh (moderate certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in surgery for recurrent prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Anterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Apical compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).
Vaginal procedure showed no clear difference in intraoperative Visceral injury compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Posterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in bladder function ‐ Stress urinary incontinence compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (low certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in painful intercourse ‐ Dyspareunia compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (low certainty).