Neurovascular injury · patients with trigger finger
It is very uncertain whether endoscopic surgery changes neurovascular injury compared with open surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Resolution of symptoms Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
3 findings from 1 review
Pain (short‐term) Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
3 findings from 1 review
Physical function · patients with trigger finger
3 findings from 1 review
Participant global assessment of success Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
3 findings from 1 review
Recurrence ‐ not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
3 findings from 1 review
Adverse events Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
3 findings from 1 review
Neurovascular injury Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
3 findings from 1 review
Recurrence · patients with trigger finger
Open surgery may leads to lower recurrence compared with steroid injection (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (infection, tendon or pulley injury, flare, cutaneous discomfort, fat necrosis) · patients with trigger finger
Open surgery showed no clear difference in adverse events (infection, tendon or pulley injury, flare, cutaneous… compared with steroid injection (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Neurovascular injury · patients with trigger finger
Open surgery showed no clear difference in neurovascular injury compared with steroid injection (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Resolution of symptoms · patients with trigger finger
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes resolution of symptoms (after 1 or more injections) compared with steroid injection (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain intensity (0‐10cm visual analogue scale) · patients with trigger finger
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Pain. WOMAC normalised to 0‐20 pain scale based on largest study reporting the 0‐20 scale (Hurley 2007). Lower score indicated less pain. Mean duration of · people with chronic hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Physical function. WOMAC function scales normalised to 0‐100. Lower score indicated improved physical function. Mean duration of · people with chronic hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Self‐efficacy. Self‐efficacy scores transformed to exercise beliefs score with score range from 17 to 85. Higher score indicated greater self‐efficacy. Mean duration of · people with chronic hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Depression. Depression scores were transformed to the HADS depression scale with score range of 0‐21. Lower score indicated less depression. Mean duration of · people with chronic hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anxiety. HADS scale of 0‐21. Lower score indicated lower anxiety levels. Mean duration of · people with chronic hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
SF‐36 social function. Domain of SF‐36 considered representative of quality of life: mental health domain largely covered by depression and anxiety above: scale of 0‐100. Higher score indicated improved social function. Mean duration of · people with chronic hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse effects of treatment · people with chronic hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found