What do systematic reviews say?

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

Pelvic floor muscle training probably leads to higher participant‐perceived cure or improvement after treatment Treatment… compared with control (moderate certainty).

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 6.33 [3.88, 10.33]
  3 studies · 242 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  7 studies · 432 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 185 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  7 studies · 7 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 6 participants
  Low

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

Pelvic floor muscle training probably leads to higher participant‐perceived cure after treatment Treatment duration: 8–12… compared with control (moderate certainty).

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 5.34 [2.78, 10.26]
  3 studies · 290 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

Pelvic floor muscle training probably leads to higher participant‐perceived cure or improvement after treatment Treatment… compared with control (moderate certainty).

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.39 [1.64, 3.47]
  2 studies · 166 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 349 participants
  Moderate

Any washout vs no washout

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 53 participants
  Low

One washout solution vs another

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

One washout solution vs another

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

One washout solution vs another

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

One washout solution vs another

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

One washout solution vs another

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Any washout vs no washout

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 23 participants
  Very low

Any washout vs no washout

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 23 participants
  Very low

Any washout vs no washout

It is very uncertain whether any washout changes number of catheters used (Number of participants needing catheter… compared with no washout (very low certainty).

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.67 [0.34, 1.31]
  1 study · 40 participants
  Very low

Any washout vs no washout

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Any washout vs no washout

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Any washout vs no washout

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found