All‐cause mortality · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis
ePTFE‐covered stents may leads to lower all‐cause mortality compared with bare stents (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Hepatic encephalopathy · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis
It is very uncertain whether ePTFE‐covered stents changes hepatic encephalopathy compared with bare stents (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Kidney failure · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis
It is very uncertain whether ePTFE‐covered stents changes kidney failure compared with bare stents (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Shunt dysfunctiona · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis
ePTFE‐covered stents may leads to lower shunt dysfunctiona compared with bare stents (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis
ePTFE‐covered stents may leads to lower upper gastrointestinal bleeding compared with bare stents (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Recurrence of ascites · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis
ePTFE‐covered stents may leads to lower recurrence of ascites compared with bare stents (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Shunt dysfunction · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis
ePTFE‐covered stents may leads to lower shunt dysfunction compared with bare stents (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Total mortalitya · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis
It is very uncertain whether ePTFE‐covered stents changes all‐cause mortalitya compared with bare stents (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Procedure‐related complications · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis
It is very uncertain whether ePTFE‐covered stents changes procedure‐related complications compared with bare stents (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Awareness of prolapse · women with apical vaginal vault prolapse
Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher awareness of prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Surgery for recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in surgery for recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or greater) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mesh exposure · women with apical uterine prolapse
It is very uncertain whether vaginal hysterectomy changes mesh exposure compared with sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Operating time · women with apical uterine prolapse
1 finding from 1 review
Length of hospital stay · women with apical uterine prolapse
1 finding from 1 review
Blood loss (mls) · women with apical uterine prolapse
1 finding from 1 review
Awareness of prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse
Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Surgery for recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse
Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in surgery for recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse
Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mesh exposure · women with apical uterine prolapse
It is very uncertain whether vaginal hysteropexy changes mesh exposure (1‐4 years) compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review