Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,811 questions · 70,850 findings · 5,139 reviews

No studies found 15,174 · 21.4%GRADE not reported 6,479 · 9.1%Very low 17,330 · 24.5%Low 17,814 · 25.1%Moderate 11,056 · 15.6%High 2,997 · 4.2%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) vs conventional anticoagulation

Recurrent DVT (3 to 12 months) · participants with diagnosed DVT

Oral DTIs showed no clear difference in recurrent DVT (7 months) compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) vs conventional anticoagulation

Non‐fatal PE (3 to 12 months) · participants with diagnosed DVT

Oral DTIs showed no clear difference in non‐fatal PE (7 months) compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) vs conventional anticoagulation

All‐cause mortality (7 months) · participants with diagnosed DVT

Oral DTIs showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (7 months) compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Recurrent DVT (3 to 12 months) · participants with diagnosed DVT

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in recurrent DVT (3 to 12 months) compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Fatal PE (3 to 12 months) · participants with diagnosed DVT

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in fatal PE (3 to 12 months) compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) vs conventional anticoagulation

Recurrent PE · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) showed no clear difference in recurrent PEa compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

All‐cause mortality · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Major bleedinge · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in major bleedinge compared with conventional anticoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) vs conventional anticoagulation

Recurrent VTEc · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) showed no clear difference in recurrent VTEc compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) vs conventional anticoagulation

DVTd · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) showed no clear difference in DVTd compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) vs conventional anticoagulation

Major bleedinge · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) showed no clear difference in major bleedinge compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Recurrent PE · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in recurrent PEa compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Recurrent VTEc · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in recurrent VTEc compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review