Adverse events: thromboembolic events · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
It is very uncertain whether pazopanib changes specific adverse events: thromboembolic events compared with lapatinib (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: hypertension · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
Pazopanib probably leads to higher specific adverse events: hypertension compared with lapatinib (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
Pazopanib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events compared with lapatinib (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Economic evaluation ‐ not measured · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Specific adverse events: serious thromboembolic events · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy probably leads to higher specific adverse events: serious thromboembolic events compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: hypertension · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy probably leads to higher specific adverse events: hypertension compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy probably leads to higher serious adverse events compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Economic evaluation · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
Cediranib plus chemotherapy showed no clear difference in overall survival compared with placebo plus chemotherapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
It is very uncertain whether cediranib plus chemotherapy changes specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae compared with placebo plus chemotherapy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
All intervention options · people with first recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV), BEV + lomustine (LOM), regorafenib (REG), fotemustine…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
BEV+IRI (1 RCT, 79 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention leads to higher BEV+IRI (1 RCT, 79 participants) (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV+VB111 (1 RCT, 128 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention leads to higher BEV+VB111 (1 RCT, 128 participants) (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV+TRC 105 (1 RCT, 49 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention leads to higher BEV+TRC 105 (1 RCT, 49 participants) (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
All intervention options · people with first recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV), BEV + lomustine (LOM), regorafenib (REG), BEV + irinotecan…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Outcomes (5 RCTs, 1024 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV(8 RCTs; 498 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
FOM (1 RCT, 32 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention showed no clear difference in FOM (1 RCT, 32 participants); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV+HSPPC96 1 RCTs; 53 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention showed no clear difference in BEV+HSPPC96 1 RCTs; 53 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV+ONA(1 RCT; 64 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention showed no clear difference in BEV+ONA(1 RCT; 64 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review