evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,860 questions · 64,864 findings · 4,913 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 13,869 · 21.4%GRADE not reported 3,491 · 5.4%Very low 16,300 · 25.1%Low 17,338 · 26.7%Moderate 10,900 · 16.8%High 2,966 · 4.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Patient‐reported pain: at more than 24 months · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings probably leads to lower patient‐reported pain: at more than 24 months compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings leads to lower number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs autologous fascial slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with autologous fascial slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Subjective cure or improvement of urinary incontinence: at 12 months · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in subjective cure or improvement of urinary incontinence: at 12 months compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without pan‐retinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs PRP alone

Complete regression of new vessels (dichotomous outcome) · proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without… probably leads to higher complete regression of new vessels (dichotomous outcome) compared with PRP alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without pan‐retinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs PRP alone

Presence of vitreous haemorrhaged · proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without… probably leads to lower presence of vitreous haemorrhaged compared with PRP alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without pan‐retinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs PRP alone

Need for vitrectomy · proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without… may leads to lower need for vitrectomy compared with PRP alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review