Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

715 questions · 767 findings · 53 reviews · Back and Neck

No studies found 149 · 19.4%GRADE not reported 41 · 5.3%Very low 168 · 21.9%Low 226 · 29.5%Moderate 156 · 20.3%High 27 · 3.5%

Acute to subacute CGH: Cervical stretch/ROM vs sham

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with subAcute cervicogenic headache (CGH)

Acute to subacute CGH: Cervical stretch/ROM showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: VAS 0 no pain to 100 worst pain ( compared with SHAM (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs no intervention

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: VAS 0 no pain to 10 worst pain ( compared with NO INTERVENTION (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs no intervention

Function: NPNPQ 0% no disability to 100% maximum disability ( · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in function: NPNPQ 0% no disability to 100% maximum disability ( compared with NO INTERVENTION (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs no intervention

Global Perceived Effect · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in global Perceived Effect: VAS 0 to 100 ( compared with NO INTERVENTION (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization + Manual Therapy vs manual therapy

Pain intensity VAS (0 to 100; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain) · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: 6 weeks treatment VAS 0 no pain to 10 worst pain ( compared with manual Therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization + Manual Therapy vs manual therapy

Function: NPNPQ 0% no disability to 100% maximum disability ( · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in function: NPNPQ 0% no disability to 100% maximum disability ( compared with manual Therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization + Manual Therapy vs manual therapy

Global Perceived Effect · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in global Perceived Effect: VAS 0 to 100 ( compared with manual Therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic MND: Cervical/UE Stretch/ROM Exercise + Cervical/UE Strengthening + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs sham

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with chronic MND

Chronic MND: Cervical/UE Stretch/ROM Exercise + Cervical/UE… showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: VAS 0 no pain to 100 worst pain ( compared with PLACEBO or SHAM (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic MND: Cervical/UE Stretch/ROM Exercise + Cervical/UE Strengthening + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs sham

Function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( · patients with chronic MND

Chronic MND: Cervical/UE Stretch/ROM Exercise + Cervical/UE… showed no clear difference in function: 2 months treatment NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum… compared with PLACEBO or SHAM (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic MND: Cervical Stretch/ROM Exercises + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs sham

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with chronic MND

Chronic MND: Cervical Stretch/ROM Exercises + Dynamic Cervical… showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: VAS 0 no pain to 100 worst pain ( compared with SHAM (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic MND: Cervical Stretch/ROM Exercises + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs sham

Function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( · patients with chronic MND

Chronic MND: Cervical Stretch/ROM Exercises + Dynamic Cervical… showed no clear difference in function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( compared with SHAM (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic MND: Cervical/Scapulothoracic/UE Stretch + UE Endurance Training vs no treatment or waiting list

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale)

Chronic MND: Cervical/Scapulothoracic/UE Stretch + UE Endurance… showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: VAS 0 no pain to 100 worst pain ( compared with NO INTERVENTION or WAIT LIST (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic MND: Cervical/Scapulothoracic/UE Stretch + UE Endurance Training vs no treatment or waiting list

Function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability (

Chronic MND: Cervical/Scapulothoracic/UE Stretch + UE Endurance… showed no clear difference in function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( compared with NO INTERVENTION or WAIT LIST (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review