Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,317 questions · 75,239 findings · 5,342 reviews

No studies found 15,213 · 20.2%GRADE not reported 10,323 · 13.7%Very low 17,528 · 23.3%Low 17,951 · 23.9%Moderate 11,190 · 14.9%High 3,034 · 4%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) vs off‐midline closure (Limberg flap)

Proportion of wounds healed · pilonidal sinus

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in proportion of wounds healed compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) vs off‐midline closure (Limberg flap)

Recurrence · pilonidal sinus

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in recurrence rate compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) vs off‐midline closure (Limberg flap)

Wound infection · pilonidal sinus

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in wound infection compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) vs off‐midline closure (Limberg flap)

Wound dehiscence · pilonidal sinus

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in wound dehiscence compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure vs conventional midline closure

Proportion of wounds healed · pilonidal sinus

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure changes proportion of wounds healed compared with conventional midline closure (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Favipiravir vs no treatment, supportive treatment, or other antiviral treatment

All‐cause mortality – at 28 to 30 days, or in‐hospital · people with confirmed COVID‐19

It is very uncertain whether favipiravir changes all‐cause mortality – at 28 to 30 days, or in‐hospital compared with no treatment, supportive treatment, or other antiviral treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Favipiravir vs no treatment, supportive treatment, or other antiviral treatment

Clinical worsening: need for invasive mechanical ventilation up to 14 days  · people with confirmed COVID‐19

It is very uncertain whether favipiravir changes progression to invasive mechanical ventilation compared with no treatment, supportive treatment, or other antiviral treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Favipiravir vs no treatment, supportive treatment, or other antiviral treatment

Time to clinical improvement (defined as time to a 2‐point reduction in patients’ admission status on WHO’s ordinal scale) · people with confirmed COVID‐19

It is very uncertain whether favipiravir changes time to clinical improvement (defined as time to a 2‐point reduction… compared with no treatment, supportive treatment, or other antiviral treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review