Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,187 questions · 1,248 findings · 108 reviews · Stroke

No studies found 275 · 22%GRADE not reported 56 · 4.5%Very low 269 · 21.6%Low 349 · 28%Moderate 216 · 17.3%High 83 · 6.7%

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy vs No marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy

Efficacy (functional outcome) · stroke and/or TIA

It is very uncertain whether marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy changes primary outcome: efficacy (functional outcome) compared with no marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy vs No marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy

Recurrent events (both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke) · stroke and/or TIA

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy showed no clear difference in recurrent events (both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke) compared with no marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy vs No marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy

Adverse events · stroke and/or TIA

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with no marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy vs No marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy

Recurrent events: fatal or non‐fatal (same type of stroke, i.e. ischaemic or haemorrhagic) · stroke and/or TIA

It is very uncertain whether marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy changes recurrent events: fatal or non‐fatal (same type of stroke, i.e.… compared with no marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

General anaesthesia vs non‐general anaesthesia

Functional outcomes · acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment (long‐term)
3 findings from 1 review