Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,317 questions · 75,239 findings · 5,342 reviews

No studies found 15,213 · 20.2%GRADE not reported 10,323 · 13.7%Very low 17,528 · 23.3%Low 17,951 · 23.9%Moderate 11,190 · 14.9%High 3,034 · 4%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) vs pulse spray technique

Technical success · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) changes technical success compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) vs pulse spray technique

Minor adverse events · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) changes minor adverse events compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) vs pulse spray technique

Major adverse events · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) changes major adverse events compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical thrombectomy vs different types of endovascular interventions

Patency at 30 days · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes patency at 30 days compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical thrombectomy vs different types of endovascular interventions

Technical success · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes technical success compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical thrombectomy vs different types of endovascular interventions

Major adverse events · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes major adverse events compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical thrombectomy vs different types of endovascular interventions

Minor adverse events · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes minor adverse events compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review