Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure changes recurrence rate compared with tension‐free midline closure (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure changes wound infection compared with tension‐free midline closure (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure changes wound dehiscence compared with tension‐free midline closure (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in proportion of wounds healed compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in recurrence rate compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in wound infection compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in wound dehiscence compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure changes proportion of wounds healed compared with conventional midline closure (very low certainty).