Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,139 questions · 1,173 findings · 89 reviews · Neuromuscular

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 302 · 25.7%GRADE not reported 119 · 10.1%Very low 267 · 22.8%Low 239 · 20.4%Moderate 177 · 15.1%High 69 · 5.9%

Intrathecal injected nusinersen vs sham

Muscle strength · children with SMA type II

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intrathecal injected nusinersen vs sham

Acquiring the ability to stand or walk · children with SMA type II

Intrathecal injected nusinersen showed no clear difference in acquiring the ability to stand or walk compared with sham procedure (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.5 [0.03, 7.8]
1 study · 126 participants
Low

Intrathecal injected nusinersen vs sham

Change in quality of life · children with SMA type II

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intrathecal injected nusinersen vs sham

Change in pulmonary function · children with SMA type II

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intrathecal injected nusinersen vs sham

Time from beginning of treatment until death or full‐time ventilation · children with SMA type II

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral creatine vs placebo

Acquiring the ability to stand or walk · children with SMA types II and III

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intrathecal injected nusinersen vs sham

Adverse events related to treatment · children with SMA type II

Intrathecal injected nusinersen showed no clear difference in adverse events related to treatment compared with sham procedure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.9 [0.9, 1]
1 study · 126 participants
Moderate

Oral olesoxime vs placebo

Change in disability score · non‐ambulatory children and adolescents with SMA types II and III

4 findings from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 160 participants
Very low
Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 160 participants
Very low
Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.43
1 study · 160 participants
Very low

Show 1 more finding

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 160 participants
Low

Oral olesoxime vs placebo

Muscle strength · non‐ambulatory children and adolescents with SMA types II and III

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral olesoxime vs placebo

Acquiring the ability to stand or walk · non‐ambulatory children and adolescents with SMA types II and III

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral olesoxime vs placebo

Change in quality of life · non‐ambulatory children and adolescents with SMA types II and III

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 108 participants
Low

Oral olesoxime vs placebo

Change in pulmonary function · non‐ambulatory children and adolescents with SMA types II and III

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 102 participants
Low

Oral olesoxime vs placebo

Time from beginning of treatment until death or full‐time ventilation · non‐ambulatory children and adolescents with SMA types II and III

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 160 participants
Moderate

Oral creatine vs placebo

Change in quality of life · children with SMA types II and III

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 38 participants
Low

Oral olesoxime vs placebo

Adverse events related to treatment · non‐ambulatory children and adolescents with SMA types II and III

Oral olesoxime probably leads to lower adverse events related to treatment compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.95 [0.91, 0.99]
1 study · 165 participants
Moderate

Oral phenylbutyrate vs placebo

Change in disability score · children with SMA type II

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 90 participants
Low

Oral phenylbutyrate vs placebo

Muscle strength · children with SMA type II

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Low

Oral phenylbutyrate vs placebo

Acquiring the ability to stand or walk · children with SMA type II

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral phenylbutyrate vs placebo

Change in quality of life · children with SMA type II

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral phenylbutyrate vs placebo

Change in pulmonary function · children with SMA type II

1 finding from 1 review

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 67 participants
Low