Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Vascular

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 1 · 33.3%

Endovascular revascularisation vs conservative therapy

Disease‐specific quality of life · intermittent claudication

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 301 participants
High

Endovascular revascularisation plus conservative therapy vs conservative therapy

Disease‐specific quality of life · intermittent claudication

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 330 participants
Moderate

Endovascular revascularisation vs no therapy

Disease‐specific quality of life · intermittent claudication

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found