Adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of · participants with recurrent (1‐course BCG failure) high‐risk non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer (49 men, 31 women)Country: Italy
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine changes grade III–V adverse events compared with BCG (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Gemcitabine showed no clear difference in grade III–V adverse events compared with saline (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously untreated patients with mRCC
Interferon‐α combined with targeted therapies may leads to higher adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with standard targeted therapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously untreated patients with mRCC
Interferon‐α alone probably leads to lower adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with interferon‐α plus bevacizumab (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously untreated patients with mRCC
Interferon‐α plus bevacizumab showed no clear difference in adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with standard targeted therapies (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously untreated patients with mRCC
Vaccine treatment showed no clear difference in adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with standard therapies (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously treated patients with mRCC
Targeted immunotherapy alone probably leads to lower adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with standard targeted therapies (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously untreated patients with mRCC
Interferon‐α alone may leads to higher adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with standard targeted therapies (sunitinib or temsirolimus) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: grade 1 to 2 · participants with recurrent (1‐course BCG failure) high‐risk non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer (49 men, 31 women)Country: Italy
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine changes grade I or II adverse events compared with BCG (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: grade 1 to 2 · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Gemcitabine showed no clear difference in grade I or II adverse events compared with saline (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events (grade 3 to 4) · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a favourable risk according to the International Metastatic…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Adverse events (grade 3 or 4) · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and an intermediate or poor risk according to the International…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of
Early taxane‐based chemotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may leads to higher grade III to V adverse events compared with ADT only (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of · participants with advanced or metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer
Immune checkpoint inhibitors probably leads to lower adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of compared with any first‐line chemotherapy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of · participants with advanced or metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer
Immune checkpoint inhibitors may leads to lower adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of compared with any second‐line chemotherapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Tivozanib may leads to lower serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with sorafenib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
It is very uncertain whether sorafenib changes serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with pazopanib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with everolimus (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with avelumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with pembrolizumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy +… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review