Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,918 questions · 5,537 findings · 1,803 reviews

No studies found 1,309 · 23.6%GRADE not reported 440 · 7.9%Very low 1,560 · 28.2%Low 1,292 · 23.3%Moderate 751 · 13.6%High 185 · 3.3%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) vs pulse spray technique

Minor adverse events · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) changes minor adverse events compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) vs pulse spray technique

Major adverse events · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) changes major adverse events compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical thrombectomy vs different types of endovascular interventions

Major adverse events · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes major adverse events compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical thrombectomy vs different types of endovascular interventions

Minor adverse events · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes minor adverse events compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review