Foam surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
4,918 questions · 5,537 findings · 1,803 reviews
No studies found 1,309 · 23.6%GRADE not reported 440 · 7.9%Very low 1,560 · 28.2%Low 1,292 · 23.3%Moderate 751 · 13.6%High 185 · 3.3%
Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.
Foam surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Foam surfaces vs reactive foam and gel surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Foam surfaces vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted3 studies · 2181 participantsVery low
Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 72 participantsVery low
Reactive air surfaces vs reactive water surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive air surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive air surfaces vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive water surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive fibre surfaces vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces
All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces
All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces on ward beds vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and subsequently on ward beds
All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 198 participantsVery low
Reactive gel surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive water surfaces vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces
All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces
All reported adverse events · people with pressure ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 156 participantsLow
Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces
All reported adverse events · people with pressure ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 120 participantsVery low
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs foam surfaces
All reported adverse events · people with pressure ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 49 participantsVery low
Any prophylaxis vs on‐demand treatment
Any reported adverse events · participants with haemophilia
Prophylaxis regimen probably leads to higher any reported adverse events compared with on‐demand treatment (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Clotting factor concentrates for preventing bleeding and bleeding‐related complications in previously treated… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.71 [1.24, 2.37]2 studies · 131 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Prophylactic vs 'as required' anti‐staphylococcal antibiotics
Adverse events of treatment · children with cystic fibrosis
1 finding from 1 review
- Prophylactic anti‐staphylococcal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 119 participantsLow
Intervention not reported
Adverse events (short term) · participants with glaucoma or intraocular hypertension
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low