What do systematic reviews say?

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs drugs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs injectable treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs anterior repair

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs bladder neck (needle) suspension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs no treatment/sham

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs laparoscopic colposuspension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs a single‐incision sling (mini‐sling)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs conservative management

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Suction curettage under hysteroscopy vs under ultrasonography

It is very uncertain whether suction curettage under hysteroscopy changes adverse effects after UAE compared with under ultrasonography (very low certainty).

• Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 3.09 [0.12, 78.7]
  1 study · 66 participants
  Very low

Aromatherapy plus analgesia vs placebo plus analgesia

• Complementary and alternative therapies for post‐caesarean pain 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 80 participants
  Very low

Massage (foot and hand) plus analgesia vs analgesia

• Complementary and alternative therapies for post‐caesarean pain 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 266 participants
  Very low

Music plus analgesia vs placebo plus analgesia

• Complementary and alternative therapies for post‐caesarean pain 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 77 participants
  Very low

Reiki plus analgesia vs analgesia

• Complementary and alternative therapies for post‐caesarean pain 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 90 participants
  Very low

Laxative plus bulking agent vs laxative alone

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for preventing postpartum constipation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Rufinamide vs placebo

Rufinamide may leads to higher adverse effects: diplopia compared with placebo (low certainty).

• Rufinamide add‐on therapy for drug‐resistant epilepsy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 4.6 [2.53, 8.38]
  3 studies · 1295 participants
  Low

Rufinamide vs placebo

Rufinamide probably leads to higher adverse effects: headache compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

• Rufinamide add‐on therapy for drug‐resistant epilepsy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.36 [1.08, 1.69]
  3 studies · 1228 participants
  Moderate

Rufinamide vs placebo

Rufinamide may leads to higher adverse effects: vomiting compared with placebo (low certainty).

• Rufinamide add‐on therapy for drug‐resistant epilepsy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.95 [1.8, 4.82]
  4 studies · 777 participants
  Low

Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

• Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal… 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Five studies assessed adverse events. One did not report findings, but the others reported either no adverse events or minor adverse events that did not significantly differ between interventions.
  5 studies
  GRADE not reported

Flossing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

• Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal… 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Adverse effects were assessed and reported in seven studies. Three reported no adverse events on the oral hard or soft tissues. Four reported sporadic adverse events with mild severity, with no evidence of a difference…
  7 studies
  GRADE not reported

Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

• Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal… 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Three studies reported that there were no adverse events, one reported one incidence of aphthous ulcer in irrigator group, one reported oral lacerations but found no difference between the interventions, and one did…
  5 studies
  GRADE not reported