Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

557 questions · 600 findings · 75 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 188 · 31.3%GRADE not reported 62 · 10.3%Very low 154 · 25.7%Low 122 · 20.3%Moderate 62 · 10.3%High 12 · 2%

Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection

Function Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection

Participant global assessment of success Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection

Recurrence · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes recurrence compared with steroid injection (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.57 [0.21, 1.59]
5 studies · 392 participants
Very low

Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection

Adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or −0 injury, dysaesthesia, and skin atrophy or hypopigmentation) · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or −0… compared with steroid injection (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.58 [0.91, 2.75]
5 studies · 392 participants
Very low

Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection

Neurovascular injury · patients with trigger finger

Percutaneous surgery showed no clear difference in neurovascular injury compared with steroid injection (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.35 [0.04, 3.29]
2 studies · 191 participants
Low

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Resolution of symptoms · patients with trigger finger

Percutaneous surgery showed no clear difference in resolution of symptoms compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.97, 1.02]
5 studies · 429 participants
Low

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Pain (1 to 6 scale) · patients with trigger finger

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 36 participants
Very low

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Function Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Participant global assessment of success Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Recurrence · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes recurrence compared with open surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.28 [0.01, 6.83]
4 studies · 397 participants
Very low

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or pulley injury, oedema or inflammation or hematoma, adherence) · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or… compared with open surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.8 [0.17, 3.68]
5 studies · 429 participants
Very low

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Neurovascular injury · patients with trigger finger

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 397 participants
Very low

Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection

Resolution of symptoms · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes resolution of symptoms (after 1 or more injections) compared with steroid injection (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.11 [0.31, 14.51]
2 studies · 191 participants
Very low

Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection

Pain intensity (0‐10cm visual analogue scale) · patients with trigger finger

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 222 participants
Very low

Image guided surgery vs surgery

Complete resection ‐ iMRI · high‐grade glioma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Image guided surgery for the resection of brain tumours 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Septic abdominal complications (presence or absence) Clinical definition · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in septic abdominal complications (presence or absence) Clinical… compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.66 [0.3, 1.47]
2 studies · 214 participants
Low

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Pulmonary complications (0 to 30 days) · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in pulmonary complications (presence or absence) compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.52 [0.08, 3.55]
3 studies · 315 participants
Low

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Surgical site infection · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in surgical site infection compared with open surgery (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.28 [0.08, 1]
3 studies · 315 participants
Moderate

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Suture dehiscence · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in suture dehiscence compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.52 [0.29, 7.98]
3 studies · 315 participants
Low

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Postoperative ileus · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in postoperative ileus compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.54 [0.16, 1.8]
3 studies · 315 participants
Low