Question · asked by 1 review
Habit reversal vs waiting list control: Life interference
- Population
- Adults over 18 years of age with chronic orofacial pain (temporomandibular disorder (TMD))
- Intervention
- Habit reversal
- Comparison
- waiting list control
- Outcome
- Life interference
Habit reversal showed no clear difference in life interference compared with waiting list control; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Habit reversal vs Waiting list control Life interference · Adults over 18 years of age with chronic orofacial pain (temporomandibular disorder (TMD)) · Short term (post-treatment) Habit reversal showed no clear difference in life interference compared with waiting list control; GRADE not reported. Psychosocial interventions for the management of chronic orofacial pain (2011) · Cochrane All outcomes | SMD -0.86 [-1.79, 0.06] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosocial interventions for the management of chronic orofacial pain 2011 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2010-10 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.