Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Biodentine: Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success)
- Population
- Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing DPC or pulpotomy
- Intervention
- Calcium hydroxide (CH)
- Comparison
- Biodentine
- Outcome
- Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success)
Biodentine appeared to perform better than calcium hydroxide for success, but the evidence was not pooled (2 RCTs; ungraded).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Biodentine Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing DPC or pulpotomy · ≥6 months follow-up, Dental/endodontic clinical settings across multiple countries (university, hospital, specialist and general dental practice); permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure Biodentine appeared to perform better than calcium hydroxide for success, but the evidence was not pooled (2 RCTs; ungraded). Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023) All outcomes | CH vs Biodentine was investigated in 2 RCTs for the primary outcome; not pooled. Biodentine appeared to perform better than CH (and than Theracal) in the per-trial forest plots (Figure 8). Weak evidence. | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious teeth: A systematic review and… 2023 All outcomes | 28 February 2021 (from inception to 28/2/2021) | 21 | Critically Low / Critically Low |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in immature permanent teeth · 1 review
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth of mixed/unspecified root… · 1 review
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in mature permanent teeth · 1 review
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing DPC or pulpotomy · 1 review
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing pulpotomy · 1 review
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing direct pulp capping · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.