Question · asked by 1 review

Antibiotic prophylaxis vs no treatment: Infection rate at 2 weeks postpartum ‐ perineal wound infection in third‐ or fourth‐degree tear

Antibiotic prophylaxis probably leads to lower infection rate at 2 weeks postpartum ‐ perineal wound infection in… compared with no treatment (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Antibiotic prophylaxis vs no treatment
Infection rate at 2 weeks postpartum ‐ perineal wound infection in third‐ or fourth‐degree tear · Women with third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tear during vaginal birth
Antibiotic prophylaxis probably leads to lower infection rate at 2 weeks postpartum ‐ perineal wound infection in… compared with no treatment (moderate certainty).
Antibiotic prophylaxis for third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tear during vaginal birth (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.34 [0.12, 0.96]1 study · 107 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Antibiotic prophylaxis for third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tear during vaginal birth
2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.