Question · asked by 1 review
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs acupuncture: Movement (deviation and range of mouth opening)
- Population
- Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity
- Intervention
- Stabilisation splint (SS)
- Comparison
- acupuncture
- Outcome
- Movement (deviation and range of mouth opening)
Stabilisation splint (SS) led to lower movement (deviation and range of mouth opening) compared with acupuncture; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Acupuncture Movement (deviation and range of mouth opening) · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · 3 months or less Stabilisation splint (SS) led to lower movement (deviation and range of mouth opening) compared with acupuncture; GRADE not reported. Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome (2004) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 0.55 [0.35, 0.84] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2001-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.