Massage (foot and hand) plus analgesia vs analgesia: Rescue analgesic consumption
It is very uncertain whether massage (foot and hand) plus analgesia changes rescue analgesic requirement compared with analgesia (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Massage (foot and hand) plus analgesia vs analgesia Rescue analgesic requirement · patients with post‐caesarean pain It is very uncertain whether massage (foot and hand) plus analgesia changes rescue analgesic requirement compared with analgesia (very low certainty). Complementary and alternative therapies for post‐caesarean pain (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.19 [0.09, 0.41] | 2 studies · 236 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complementary and alternative therapies for post‐caesarean pain 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.