Aqueous subcutaneous (Sc) progesterone vs vaginal progesterone: Ongoing pregnancy
It is very uncertain whether aqueous subcutaneous (Sc) progesterone changes ongoing pregnancy rate compared with vaginal progesterone gel (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Aqueous subcutaneous (Sc) progesterone vs vaginal progesterone gel Ongoing pregnancy rate · women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination It is very uncertain whether aqueous subcutaneous (Sc) progesterone changes ongoing pregnancy rate compared with vaginal progesterone gel (very low certainty). Luteal phase support for women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.05 [0.54, 2.05] | 1 study · 246 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luteal phase support for women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.