Question · asked by 1 review
Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing: Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
- Population
- Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
- Intervention
- Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing
- Comparison
- Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing
- Outcome
- Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing Periodontitis (probing pocket depth) · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate) Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling… (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | Two studies measured periodontitis but data not presented or usable (Smith 1988 PPD unusable; Graziani 2017 measured PPD but no data). | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal diseases and dental… 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-01-16 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate) · 1 review
- Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.