Question · asked by 1 review
PDHA program vs Baseline pre-intervention service-delivery scenario: School-based oral health promotion services
- Population
- Alaska children
- Intervention
- PDHA program
- Comparison
- Baseline pre-intervention service-delivery scenario
- Outcome
- School-based oral health promotion services
The PDHA program was projected to raise school-based oral health promotion service receipt from 53% to more than 90%, without a GRADE rating.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
PDHA program vs Baseline pre-intervention scenario School-based oral health promotion services · Alaska children · 20 years, Alaska The PDHA program was projected to raise school-based oral health promotion service receipt from 53% to more than 90%, without a GRADE rating. Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013) All outcomes | Percentage receiving services >90% | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions and a case study on multilevel… 2013 All outcomes | October 5, 2012 | 11 | Critically Low / Critically Low |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.