Question · asked by 1 review
ART sealant using high-viscosity glass ionomer (press-finger technique) vs No comparator: Caries-free sealed pits and fissures
- Population
- Permanent teeth with sealed pits and fissures
- Intervention
- ART sealant using high-viscosity glass ionomer (press-finger technique)
- Comparison
- No comparator
- Outcome
- Caries-free sealed pits and fissures
The pooled caries-free rate was 85% at 6 years.
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 6 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants vs No comparator Caries-free sealed pits and fissures · Permanent teeth with sealed pits and fissures · 6 years, School or clinic, permanent dentitions with high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants, 6 years The pooled caries-free rate was 85% at 6 years. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. (2011) All outcomes | Caries-free percentage 85 [79, 91] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants vs No comparator Caries-free sealed pits and fissures · Permanent teeth with sealed pits and fissures · 5 years, School or clinic, permanent dentitions with high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants, 5 years The pooled caries-free rate was 90% at 5 years. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. (2011) All outcomes | Caries-free percentage 90 [85, 94] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants vs No comparator Caries-free sealed pits and fissures · Permanent teeth with sealed pits and fissures · 2 years, School or clinic, permanent dentitions with high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants, 2 years The pooled caries-free rate was 100% at 2 years. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. (2011) All outcomes | Caries-free percentage 100 [98, 100] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants vs No comparator Caries-free sealed pits and fissures · Permanent teeth with sealed pits and fissures · 1 year, School or clinic, permanent dentitions with high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants, 1 year The pooled caries-free rate was 100% at 1 year. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. (2011) All outcomes | Caries-free percentage 100 [99, 100] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants vs No comparator Caries-free sealed pits and fissures · Permanent teeth with sealed pits and fissures · 4 years, School or clinic, permanent dentitions with high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants, 4 years The pooled caries-free rate was 93% at 4 years. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. (2011) All outcomes | Caries-free percentage 93 [91, 96] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants vs No comparator Caries-free sealed pits and fissures · Permanent teeth with sealed pits and fissures · 3 years, School or clinic, permanent dentitions with high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants, 3 years The pooled caries-free rate was 97% at 3 years. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. (2011) All outcomes | Caries-free percentage 97 [96, 98] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2012 All outcomes | All publications listed until 1 February 2010 | 29 | Critically Low / Critically Low |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- ART sealant using high-viscosity glass ionomer (press-finger technique) vs No comparator · Pits and fissures of permanent (posterior) teeth · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.