Question · asked by 1 review

Bamlanivimab vs placebo: Clinical progression: need for NIV, IMV, ECMO, or renal replacement therapy at day 5 (group 5, 6 or 7)

It is very uncertain whether bamlanivimab changes clinical progression: need for NIV, IMV, ECMO, or renal replacement… compared with placebo (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Bamlanivimab vs placebo
Clinical progression: need for NIV, IMV, ECMO, or renal replacement therapy at day 5 (group 5, 6 or 7) · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)
It is very uncertain whether bamlanivimab changes clinical progression: need for NIV, IMV, ECMO, or renal replacement… compared with placebo (very low certainty).
SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID‐19 (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.17 [0.75, 1.85]1 study · 311 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID‐19
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.