Question · asked by 1 review

Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone: Gingivitis

Population
Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
Intervention
Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing
Comparison
Toothbrushing alone
Outcome
Gingivitis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone
Gingivitis (gingival index) · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling… (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes
Gingivitis measured by gingival index: Not measured.0 studiesNo studies found
Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites) · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate) · 3 months
It is very uncertain whether wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing changes gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites) compared with toothbrushing alone (very low certainty).
Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling… (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -0.25 [-0.37, -0.13]1 study · 24 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal diseases and dental…
2019 · Cochrane All outcomes
2019-01-16Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.