Question · asked by 1 review

Glass ionomer cement vs Resin adhesive: Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment

Population
People receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (upper and/or lower full arch)
Intervention
Glass ionomer cement
Comparison
Resin adhesive
Outcome
Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment

Glass ionomer cement did not show a statistically significant difference in new white spot lesions versus resin adhesive (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Glass ionomer cement vs Resin adhesive
Incidence of new white spot lesions by visual-tactile assessment · Patients receiving comprehensive fixed orthodontic treatment · 12 to 24 months, Fixed orthodontic treatment, Overall
Glass ionomer cement did not show a statistically significant difference in new white spot lesions versus resin adhesive (very low certainty).
Efficacy of sealants and bonding materials during fixed orthodontic treatment to prevent enamel… (2021) All outcomes
RR 0.72 [0.34, 1.54]3 studies · 394 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Efficacy of sealants and bonding materials during fixed orthodontic treatment to prevent enamel demineralization: a systematic review and…
2021 All outcomes
Not specified (no date restriction on language or year)24Critically Low / Critically Low
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.