Exercise therapy vs control: Participants with serious adverse reactions
It is very uncertain whether exercise therapy changes participants with serious adverse reactions Measured after 52 weeks… compared with control (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Exercise therapy vs control Participants with serious adverse reactions Measured after 52 weeks Measured according to European Union Clinical Trials Directive by recording the number of serious reactions · men and women aged over 18 years with chronic fatigue syndrome It is very uncertain whether exercise therapy changes participants with serious adverse reactions Measured after 52 weeks… compared with control (very low certainty). Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.99 [0.14, 6.97] | 1 study · 319 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.