Question · asked by 1 review

High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs Conventional treatment using RM-GIC: Restoration failure (permanent, mature teeth)

ART using H-GIC showed no clear difference in restoration failure (permanent, mature teeth) compared with conventional treatment using RM-GIC (with local anaesthetic); GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
ART using H-GIC vs Conventional treatment using RM-GIC (with local anaesthetic)
Restoration failure (permanent, mature teeth) · Adults with root caries in permanent (mature) teeth · Coronal and root caries
ART using H-GIC showed no clear difference in restoration failure (permanent, mature teeth) compared with conventional treatment using RM-GIC (with local anaesthetic); GRADE not reported.
Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries (2017) · Cochrane All outcomes
OR 1.46 [0.74, 2.88]2 studies · 210 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries
2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
2017-02list not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.