Question · asked by 1 review
Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment) vs Supra-gingival scaling: Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), change from baseline
- Population
- Adults (any age/sex) with chronic periodontitis (>=5 teeth remaining; PPD >4 mm), with or without hypertension
- Intervention
- Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment)
- Comparison
- Supra-gingival scaling
- Outcome
- Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), change from baseline
Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without… probably leads to lower change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP, mmHg) compared with supra-gingival scaling (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment) vs Supra-gingival scaling Change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP, mmHg) · Adults (any age/sex) with chronic periodontitis (>=5 teeth remaining; PPD >4 mm), with or without hypertension · Short term (follow-up 2 months), People diagnosed with periodontitis and hypertension Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without… probably leads to lower change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP, mmHg) compared with supra-gingival scaling (moderate certainty). Effect of periodontal treatments on blood pressure (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD -8.40 [-12.19, -4.61] | 1 study · 101 participants | Moderate |
Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment) vs Supra-gingival scaling Change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP, mmHg) · Adults (any age/sex) with chronic periodontitis (>=5 teeth remaining; PPD >4 mm), with or without hypertension · Short term (follow-up 2-3 months), People diagnosed with periodontitis Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without… showed no clear difference in change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP, mmHg) compared with supra-gingival scaling (low certainty). Effect of periodontal treatments on blood pressure (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD -2.08 [-4.84, 0.68] | 2 studies · 227 participants | Low |
Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment) vs Supra-gingival scaling Change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP, mmHg) · Adults (any age/sex) with chronic periodontitis (>=5 teeth remaining; PPD >4 mm), with or without hypertension · Long term (follow-up 6 months), People diagnosed with periodontitis It is very uncertain whether intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without… changes change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP, mmHg) compared with supra-gingival scaling (very low certainty). Effect of periodontal treatments on blood pressure (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD -4.96 [-13.04, 3.13] | 2 studies · 227 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of periodontal treatments on blood pressure 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2020-11 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment) vs No treatment (no periodontal treatment) · Adults (any age/sex) with chronic periodontitis (>=5 teeth remaining; PPD >4 mm), with… · 1 review
- Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment) vs Alternative periodontal treatment · Adults (any age/sex) with chronic periodontitis (>=5 teeth remaining; PPD >4 mm), with… · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.