Question · asked by 1 review
HAART regimen + topical treatment vs HAART alone: Adverse effects of long‐term use of available topical agents
- Population
- HIV‐infected adults (> 13 years of age, per CDC) with one or more painful intraoral aphthous ulcers
- Intervention
- HAART regimen + topical treatment
- Comparison
- HAART alone
- Outcome
- Adverse effects of long‐term use of available topical agents
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
HAART regimen + topical treatment vs HAART regimen alone Adverse effects of long‐term use of available topical agents · HIV‐infected adults (> 13 years of age, per CDC) with one or more painful intraoral aphthous ulcers The review found no eligible studies for this question. Topical treatments for HIV‐related oral ulcers (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | No studies were included in this review. A total of 233 abstracts were retrieved; 25 were selected as potentially eligible but all were excluded (10 reported systemic rather than topical treatment; 3 non‐RCTs; 6… | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topical treatments for HIV‐related oral ulcers 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2011-05 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- HAART regimen + topical treatment vs HAART alone · HIV‐positive individuals of at least 15 years of age with one or more painful intraoral… · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.