ADVICE ‐ focus on activation vs no treatment: video vs no treatment: at 1 session + 2 weeks
ADVICE ‐ focus on activation showed no clear difference in video vs no treatment: at 1 session + 2 weeks compared with NO TREATMENT (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
ADVICE ‐ focus on activation vs NO TREATMENT video vs no treatment: at 1 session + 2 weeks · patients with neck pain with or without radiculopathy ADVICE ‐ focus on activation showed no clear difference in video vs no treatment: at 1 session + 2 weeks compared with NO TREATMENT (moderate certainty). Patient education for neck pain (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.02 [0.95, 1.09] | 1 study · 405 participants | Moderate |
ADVICE ‐ focus on activation vs NO TREATMENT video vs no treatment: at 1 session + 24 weeks · patients with neck pain with or without radiculopathy ADVICE ‐ focus on activation showed no clear difference in video vs no treatment: at 1 session + 24 weeks compared with NO TREATMENT (moderate certainty). Patient education for neck pain (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.79 [0.59, 1.06] | 1 study · 348 participants | Moderate |
ADVICE ‐ focus on activation vs NO TREATMENT video vs no treatment: at 1 session + 52 weeks · patients with neck pain with or without radiculopathy ADVICE ‐ focus on activation showed no clear difference in video vs no treatment: at 1 session + 52 weeks compared with NO TREATMENT (moderate certainty). Patient education for neck pain (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.89 [0.65, 1.21] | 1 study · 332 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient education for neck pain 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.