Question · asked by 1 review

Skin care intervention vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention: Stinging/allergic reactions to moisturisers (over the intervention period)

Skin care intervention showed no clear difference in stinging/allergic reactions to moisturisers (over the intervention… compared with standard skin care or no skin care intervention (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Skin care intervention vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention
Stinging/allergic reactions to moisturisers (over the intervention period) · infants age 12 months or younger
Skin care intervention showed no clear difference in stinging/allergic reactions to moisturisers (over the intervention… compared with standard skin care or no skin care intervention (low certainty).
Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.24 [0.67, 7.43]4 studies · 343 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.