Question · asked by 1 review

Metal-free implant abutments (zirconia) vs Metal implant abutments (titanium): Abutment failure

Population
Adults (18 years or older) with one missing tooth in the aesthetic zone needing an implant-supported single crown
Intervention
Metal-free implant abutments (zirconia)
Comparison
Metal implant abutments (titanium)
Outcome
Abutment failure

It is very uncertain whether metal-free implant abutments (zirconia) changes abutment failure compared with metal implant abutments (titanium) (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Metal-free implant abutments (zirconia) vs Metal implant abutments (titanium)
Abutment failure · Adults (18 years or older) with one missing tooth in the aesthetic zone needing an implant-supported single crown on… · 12 months
It is very uncertain whether metal-free implant abutments (zirconia) changes abutment failure compared with metal implant abutments (titanium) (very low certainty).
Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations (2017) · Cochrane All outcomes
OR 7.63 [0.33, 177.14]2 studies · 47 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations
2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
2017-05Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.