Question · asked by 1 review
Humour‐based interventions vs usual care: Functioning: specific ‐ social ‐ clinically important change
- Population
- patients with schizophrenia
- Intervention
- Humour‐based interventions
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Functioning: specific ‐ social ‐ clinically important change
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Humour‐based interventions vs standard care Social functioning: clinically‐important change in social functioning ‐ as defined by individual studies (long‐term). · People with schizophrenia The review found no eligible studies for this question. Humour‐based interventions for people with schizophrenia (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Humour‐based interventions for people with schizophrenia 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Humour‐based interventions vs active control · patients with schizophrenia · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.