Question · asked by 1 review
Non‐vocal communication aid vs usual care without an aid: Adverse events
- Population
- adults requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support
- Intervention
- Non‐vocal communication aid
- Comparison
- usual care without an aid
- Outcome
- Adverse events
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Non‐vocal communication aid vs usual care without an aid Adverse events · adults requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 1440 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Non‐vocal communication aid vs usual care with an aid · adults requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.