Question · asked by 1 review
Supraomohyoid neck dissection vs Modified radical neck dissection: Adverse events associated with treatment
- Population
- Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
- Intervention
- Supraomohyoid neck dissection
- Comparison
- Modified radical neck dissection
- Outcome
- Adverse events associated with treatment
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Supraomohyoid neck dissection vs Modified radical neck dissection Adverse events associated with treatment · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2023) · Cochrane All outcomes | Adverse events: significant difference in complication rates, lower for supraomohyoid (SOND 13.0% vs MRND 21.9%, P=0.040). UW-QOL at 1 year: supraomohyoid superior in pain relief (78.8% vs 75.2%, P=0.013) and shoulder… | 1 study · 332 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment 2023 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2022-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.