Question · asked by 1 review

Metal-free FDPs (zirconia ceramic) vs Metal-ceramic FDPs: Patient satisfaction (measured by patient satisfaction or aesthetic scales)

Population
Adults (18 years or older) needing a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP)
Intervention
Metal-free FDPs (zirconia ceramic)
Comparison
Metal-ceramic FDPs
Outcome
Patient satisfaction (measured by patient satisfaction or aesthetic scales)

It is very uncertain whether metal-free FDPs (zirconia ceramic) changes aesthetic evaluation (patient aesthetic satisfaction changes) compared with metal-ceramic FDPs (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Metal-free FDPs (zirconia ceramic) vs Metal-ceramic FDPs
Aesthetic evaluation (patient aesthetic satisfaction changes) · Adults (18 years or older) needing a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) · 36 months
It is very uncertain whether metal-free FDPs (zirconia ceramic) changes aesthetic evaluation (patient aesthetic satisfaction changes) compared with metal-ceramic FDPs (very low certainty).
Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations (2017) · Cochrane All outcomes
OR 15.40 [0.78, 304.61]1 study · 34 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations
2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
2017-05Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.