Summary of findings: Specialist inpatient care for weight restoration vs active outpatient or combination brief hospital/outpatient care: Secondary outcome: acceptability of treatment
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Specialist inpatient care for weight restoration changes acceptability: number of participants who completed treatment (at… compared with active outpatient or combination brief hospital/outpatient care (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: Specialist inpatient care for weight restoration vs active outpatient or combination brief hospital/outpatient care Acceptability: number of participants who completed treatment (at end of 12 months from the start of treatment) · participants with anorexia nervosa It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Specialist inpatient care for weight restoration changes acceptability: number of participants who completed treatment (at… compared with active outpatient or combination brief hospital/outpatient care (very low certainty). Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.75 [0.64, 0.88] | 3 studies · 319 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.