Question · asked by 1 review

Tooth bleaching (carbamide or hydrogen peroxide; home and/or in-office) vs No bleaching (untreated or pH-cycling control): Caries susceptibility, enamel demineralisation, erosion, or microhardness

Population
Permanent teeth / enamel specimens (in vitro)
Intervention
Tooth bleaching (carbamide or hydrogen peroxide; home and/or in-office)
Comparison
No bleaching (untreated or pH-cycling control)
Outcome
Caries susceptibility, enamel demineralisation, erosion, or microhardness

Low-quality in vitro evidence suggests that bleaching of permanent teeth does not increase susceptibility to caries, demineralisation or erosion (ungraded); the clinical question could not be answered because only in vitro studies were available.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Tooth bleaching (carbamide or hydrogen peroxide; home or in-office) vs No bleaching (untreated or pH-cycling control)
Enamel demineralisation and susceptibility to caries or acid erosion (microhardness, mineral loss) · Permanent teeth / enamel specimens (in vitro) · In vitro laboratory studies
Low-quality in vitro evidence suggests that bleaching of permanent teeth does not increase susceptibility to caries, demineralisation or erosion (ungraded); the clinical question could not be answered because only in vitro studies were available.
Is Bleaching Effective in Managing Post-orthodontic White-spot Lesions? A Systematic Review. (2020) All outcomes
Four studies at high risk of bias and one study at moderate risk reached the overall conclusion that neither home- nor in-office bleaching of permanent teeth was associated with an increased susceptibility to…5 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Is Bleaching Effective in Managing Post-orthodontic White-spot Lesions? A Systematic Review.
2020 All outcomes
2018-07-0115Low / Critically Low

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.