Question · asked by 1 review

Coating material (bonding material or sealant) WITH fluoride release vs Coating material WITHOUT fluoride release: Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment

Population
People receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (upper and/or lower full arch)
Intervention
Coating material (bonding material or sealant) WITH fluoride release
Comparison
Coating material WITHOUT fluoride release
Outcome
Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment

Fluoride-releasing coating material did not show a statistically significant reduction in new white spot lesions versus non-fluoride coating (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fluoride-releasing coating material vs Coating material without fluoride release
Incidence of new white spot lesions by visual-tactile assessment · Patients receiving comprehensive fixed orthodontic treatment · 1 to 24 months, Fixed orthodontic treatment, Overall
Fluoride-releasing coating material did not show a statistically significant reduction in new white spot lesions versus non-fluoride coating (very low certainty).
Efficacy of sealants and bonding materials during fixed orthodontic treatment to prevent enamel… (2021) All outcomes
RR 0.84 [0.70, 1.01]10 studies · 4705 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Efficacy of sealants and bonding materials during fixed orthodontic treatment to prevent enamel demineralization: a systematic review and…
2021 All outcomes
Not specified (no date restriction on language or year)24Critically Low / Critically Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.