Question · asked by 1 review

Fluoride-releasing resin-based sealant vs Resin-based sealant: Retention of sealant (complete or partial retention)

Population
Children with caries-free second primary molars, aged 4-8 years (dental clinic, Turkey and Spain)
Intervention
Fluoride-releasing resin-based sealant
Comparison
Resin-based sealant
Outcome
Retention of sealant (complete or partial retention)

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fluoride-releasing resin-based sealant vs Resin-based sealant
Retention of sealant (complete or partial retention) · Children with caries-free second primary molars, aged 4-8 years (dental clinic, Turkey and Spain) · 6-24 months
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes
Effect estimate not calculable; 69 (2 studies). Retention equivocal: Unal 2015 100% (fluoride resin) vs 96.0% (resin) at 12 months; Baca 2007 84.1% (fluoride resin) vs 97.7% (resin) at 12 months; at 24 months 87.8% vs…2 studies · 69 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-02Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.