Question · asked by 1 review
1500 ppm F toothpaste vs Non-fluoride (0 ppm F) placebo toothpaste: Adverse effects of toothpaste
- Population
- Young children with primary (deciduous) dentition (aged 1 to 6 years at study start)
- Intervention
- 1500 ppm F toothpaste
- Comparison
- Non-fluoride (0 ppm F) placebo toothpaste
- Outcome
- Adverse effects of toothpaste
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
1500 ppm F toothpaste vs Non-fluoride (0 ppm F) placebo toothpaste Adverse effects of toothpaste · Young children with primary (deciduous) dentition (aged 1 to 6 years at study start) · 24 months Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | Adverse effects of toothpaste: not estimable; 0 events reported (Fan 2008); 998 participants (1 RCT); low-certainty. | 1 study · 998 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2018-08 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.