Question · asked by 1 review

Oral long‐chain omega‐3 PUFAs vs oral omega‐6 PUFAs: Adverse event: gastrointestinal disorders at 1‐month (with actual

Oral long‐chain omega‐3 PUFAs may leads to higher adverse event: gastrointestinal disorders at 1‐month (with actual compared with oral omega‐6 PUFAs (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Oral long‐chain omega‐3 PUFAs vs oral omega‐6 PUFAs
Adverse event: gastrointestinal disorders at 1‐month (with actual · people with dry eyea
Oral long‐chain omega‐3 PUFAs may leads to higher adverse event: gastrointestinal disorders at 1‐month (with actual compared with oral omega‐6 PUFAs (low certainty).
Omega‐3 and omega‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.342 studies · 91 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Omega‐3 and omega‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease
2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.