Question · asked by 1 review

Betamethasone oral mini-pulse therapy vs Topical triamcinolone acetonide paste: Investigator‐ or physician‐rated global assessment of disease severity

Population
People with erosive oral lichen planus
Intervention
Betamethasone oral mini-pulse therapy
Comparison
Topical triamcinolone acetonide paste
Outcome
Investigator‐ or physician‐rated global assessment of disease severity

Betamethasone oral mini-pulse therapy led to higher physician Global Assessment (clinical severity, 0-12 score) compared with topical triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% paste; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Betamethasone oral mini-pulse therapy vs Topical triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% paste
Physician Global Assessment (clinical severity, 0-12 score) · People with erosive oral lichen planus · 24 weeks
Betamethasone oral mini-pulse therapy led to higher physician Global Assessment (clinical severity, 0-12 score) compared with topical triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% paste; GRADE not reported.
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD 1.78 [0.17, 3.39]1 study · 22 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites
2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
2009-09Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.