LOD with and without medical ovulation vs medical ovulation induction alone: Clincial pregnancy
LOD with and without medical ovulation showed no clear difference in clincial pregnancy compared with medical ovulation induction alone (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
LOD with and without medical ovulation vs medical ovulation induction alone Clincial pregnancy · women with anovulatory PCOS and CC resistance LOD with and without medical ovulation showed no clear difference in clincial pregnancy compared with medical ovulation induction alone (low certainty). Laparoscopic ovarian drilling for ovulation induction in women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.86 [0.72, 1.03] | 21 studies · 2016 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic ovarian drilling for ovulation induction in women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.